« Down & Out in Paris | Main | President Bush...about the Iraqi Oil programme... »

What Planet are you Americans on?

A report from The New York Times yesterday says, in part -

U.S. Says It Fears Detainee Abuse in Repatriation

"A long-running effort by the Bush administration to send home many of the terror suspects held at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, has been stymied in part because of concern among United States officials that the prisoners may not be treated humanely by their own governments, officials said.

Yes...I had to read it again, too. "concern...that the prisoners may not be treated humanely"

"Administration officials have said they hope eventually to transfer or release many of the roughly 490 suspects now held at Guantánamo. As of February, military officials said, the Pentagon was ready to repatriate more than 150 of the detainees once arrangements could be made with their home countries.

...The military has so far sent home 267 detainees from Guantánamo after finding that they had no further intelligence value and either posed no long-term security threat or would reliably be imprisoned or monitored by their own governments. Most of those who remain are considered more dangerous militants; many also come from nations with poor human rights records and ineffective justice systems.

But Washington's insistence on humane treatment for the detainees in their native countries comes after years in which Guantánamo has been assailed as a symbol of American abuse and hypocrisy — a fact not lost on the governments with which the United States is now negotiating.

"It is kind of ironic that the U.S. government is placing conditions on other countries that it would not follow itself in Guantánamo or Abu Ghraib," said a Middle Eastern diplomat from one of the countries involved in the talks.

The push for human rights assurances now, some officials said, also reflects a renewed effort by the State Department to influence the administration's detention policy, even as the United States continues to face wide criticism for sending terror suspects to be interrogated in countries known to practice torture.

...Those officials said the talks had been particularly difficult with Saudi Arabia and Yemen, two nations that account for almost half of the detainees now at Guantánamo.

The Saudi government was among the first to seek the return of its citizens from Guantánamo, and its discussions with United States officials have proceeded in fits and starts for more than three years.

Five Saudi prisoners were sent home in May 2003 in an arrangement that some officials said could be a template for future transfers.

But several American officials have since acknowledged privately that the repatriation was part of a secret, high-level pact with the Saudi and British governments, in which the Saudi authorities later freed five British citizens and two other men Saudi Arabia had convicted on what British officials said were trumped-up charges of terrorism.

United States officials said they had no indication that any of the five repatriated Saudis were abused after returning home. But as discussions have moved forward on the 128 Saudis still at Guantánamo, Saudi Arabia's record on human rights has emerged as a central obstacle, several American officials said.

According to a State Department human rights report released in March, the Saudi authorities have used "beatings, whippings and sleep deprivation" on Saudi and foreign prisoners. The report also noted "allegations of beatings with sticks and suspension from bars by handcuffs."

Mindful of such allegations, officials of the State Department's human rights bureau, among others, have insisted that any transfer deal include clear assurances that the prisoners will not be tortured and will be treated in accordance with international humanitarian law, and that those pledges can be verified, officials familiar with the discussions said."


Read the full mind-boggling dose of hypocrisy here at The New York Times

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

now now now.. Mal.. we here in America who watch NASCAR and carry lots of firearms, simply believe that most people in other parts of the world are "better off dead" we are meerly trying to make them see things in the same light.

I am not going to comment in a way that would be anti Bush now.. because I like my website running properly.. but I will say, that if you were here, you woudl see that the signals being fed to teh American Public are so mixed, that the story you quoted, seems the norm.. we get people from the same department saying that prisonrs are being treated wonderfully, and that they are being ttreated in ways far superior to any treatment they could hope to recieve from their own governments and that if we were not torturing them somone that cared a lot less for them woudl be doing it.. you see, whenever a CIA torture expert goes in to a cell, the first thing he says is always "This is going to hurnt me more than it does you." It is all a part of out Government as Father, Mother, and eventualy God Policy.

ALl Hail Bush..
Or is that spelled Heil? We all know about my spelling..
As I have said before, I will now go wait for the return of American Idol.. and hope my brain melts.
May 1, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterDeRex

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.